Twenty-eight per cent of us now live in single person households - a lonely and unnatural state - and most of the 28 per cent consist of young men. The male suicide rate goes up, female down. At best as a man you're decorative, look after the kids and earn a bit sometimes at worst you're a write-off. "Once a man could look forward to starting a family and the dignity that came from being the provider. Societies, thank God, tend to be self-righting." We steamed ahead, changing the world with too little caution, and I hope the future will forgive us. So were we wrong, we feminists, setting women free? The results have been devastating – greater than we ever imagined. "We didn't feel ashamed about one-night stands.this, we thought, is what feminism is about." Just think about what this says about journalists from the 'big' papers these days.Ĭosmopolitan (The women's magazine that urges women to use men for sex) Editor Lorraine Candy has a change of mind and now urges women not to have "Soul-less sex": Interestingly, even when the story was exposed as a scam (something which the journalists themselves should have done) some of the papers, like The Telegraph, STILL keep their stories up, and The Guardian acknowledged that it was a scam but still kept up the line that it was evidence of how feminists are intimidated (without even considering that Watson may never have taken naked photos, and hence would have known the whole thing was a scam). The usual feminist newspaper commentators of course had a field day with this and didn't appear to do even the most basic journalistic fact-checking but instead rushed-in to claim this as an example of every form of female victimisation imaginable. Similarly, there was recently an online scam whereby some company pretended to be hackers who were going to release naked photos of Emma Watson soon after she had given a feminist speech at the UN. In particular, they love using this tactic when they need to deflect attention (as in this case where they have been exposed for corruption). My take on it: the media are obsessed with making everything that involves women into a 'nasty evil men Vs poor innocent damsel in distress' story. So why can't feminists admit that there are degrees of severity with rape? Well I think the reason is because they have spent so much effort over the years in pushing less severe and more dubious instances of sex where the consent is ambiguous or regretted AFTERWARDS that they are scared that their whole project could come falling down if sufficiently challenged.
![gay memes men gay memes men](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/b9/c6/5d/b9c65d9b20d4a544fc26287d0480c6d2.jpg)
After all, surely most crimes are made worse by the presence of violence? For example, would you not see any difference between a burglary and a burglary that also involved a violent attack? To say that the burglary with a violent attack was worse is not to deny that the one without wasn't still a violation.
![gay memes men gay memes men](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/a3/0b/6f/a30b6f7e0edb92d5b416a22ea506a3ea.jpg)
To anyone with any common sense left (an ever diminishing breed) this might seem perplexing. a woman has already had sex with a man before, and goes to bed with him, but then changes her mind but doesn't really say anything). violent) might just be worse than other (e.g. We seem to be hearing about it more and more, and there is ever greater drama and social-media screaming whenever anyone suggests that one type of rape (e.g.
![gay memes men gay memes men](https://media.makeameme.org/created/in-2019-gay.jpg)
There seems to be greater hysteria than ever about rape.